NOTA | My notes system

I get asked often about how I take notes, so this is the place where I describe my notes system and practice.

📝
This page describes my notes system in brief. I also recorded a short explainer above in 2024. For the thinking behind the system, see its accompaniment, Writing for insight: Some design principles.

Good notes tend to help us move from one position of knowledge to the other, which is hard to do without gathering what you need systematically so that you can find it when you need it. In my system, each note represents one atom of an idea or fact that can stand alone and interact with another. This principle of atomicity helps maintain clarity and precision in organising ideas. Like LEGOs, these notes can easily be reassembled into endless configurations without disrupting its basic elements. Each note is a building block that can be linked to others in creative ways without relying on me to recall them. Because they aren't organised through a top-down taxonomy, more patterns in thinking can emerge organically.

Anatomy of an atom

There are two types of notes in my system:

  • 🔹 reading memory (facts, events, reports)
  • 🔸 second memory (concepts, claims, ideas)

Each note is formatted the same:

  1. A brief description of what I want to remember
  2. Why I saved it
  3. Quotes from references or sources
  4. Links to other notes connected to it in the system
  5. Hashtags based on context so I can find them again in the right situation

Example of a molecule

Here's what a 'molecule' looks like. This is the shape of the post that accompanies this page, Writing for insight: Some design principles.

Writing for insight: Some design principles
How did I take notes before? What did I learn about writing for insight? What does my system look like now since its first design in 2020? How do I know what I know?

Some of the notes that went into that post are:

  • 🔹 Breaks are not just for recovery, but for absorbing information into long-term memory
  • 🔸 Any benefits of top-down or first-order note-taking approaches usually decrease the more notes you generate
  • 🔹 The brain can't tell between a task that's done and a task that's postponed with a note
  • 🔹 The GTD Getting Things Done principle is to collect everything in one place and process it in a standard way
  • 🔸 Starting from scratch is not possible, interpretation is a hermeneutic circle
  • 🔸 You become more open to new ideas the more familiar you are with ideas you already encountered
  • 🔸 Writing for insight requires a flexible use of the whole spectrum of attention on its many distinct tasks

Up close, it looks like this:

The zettelkasten

That video I made is just one way of viewing my notes system. There are other ways I can view and retrieve these notes in different combinations. You can build your own system in other apps or even mediums. My partner is dyslexic and started his notes system the same year I did; it looks totally different from mine although we use the same principles. Consider that the first version of the system I was inspired by— the zettelkasten— was fully analogue, when hashtags or the idea of / as going deeper into a directory weren't even a thing yet. A man named Niklas Luhmann built it on index cards and then went on to become shockingly prolific, writing 70 books and 400 articles in his lifetime (though I can't say I've read any of these cover to cover).

A file cabinet that belonged to Niklas Luhmann displaying his card index system. Various drawers are open, revealing rows of handwritten index cards. In the center, one index card sits on top of a fully extended drawer.
A small part of Niklas Luhmann's card index system with handwritten index cards. Image: imago images / teutopress

He didn't start early, and so credits his note-taking system for much of his ability to write. This was before anything digital, so his note taking system was a large box of handwritten index cards that he would add to and connect between each other in different ways. Since then, many zettelkasten enthusiasts have built their own in many places and discuss them in many forums. In my case, I went for Obsidian— there was a bit of a learning curve with Markdown, but nothing beats being able to have my entire system in a USB stick and easy to move to another app if I ever need to someday.

When people ask about my notes system, I usually recommend they read Sönke Ahrens, How to Take Smart Notes: One Simple Technique to Boost Writing, Learning and Thinking. I read it back in 2019 but I think now it's in its second edition (2022)— and when I recommend it I often include a caveat.

Other apps

Besides my notes system itself, Obsidian also holds my daily reviews, bibliography, and a writing studio in other folders. Outside of Obsidian, I use Raindrop for link dumps (so I don't have bookmarks from ig, clock app, twitter spread out in different apps and can't search for them) and Are.na channels for curating stuff around specific contexts and themes.

The video up top is also on YouTube:

Writing for insight: Some design principles
How did I take notes before? What did I learn about writing for insight? How do I know what I know? Written at the 5-year mark of my zettelkasten practice.

🪬
Liy is a Southeast Asian Muslim knowledge worker and poet, sharing what they learned from the periphery to prep for precarious futures. This is an ad-free space outside of the algo. If you're new here (hello!) or need a refresher, start here for house rules. Here is what I am up to now. I spend time thinking out of my zettelkasten notes system and sharing playlists of curated treasures from my time travels. Consider subscribing for free to read more and stay in touch— I only send out letters a few times a year. If you valued something here, tell me over DM (if we have access to each other) or tip this cryptid with a message— that sends a clear signal of appreciation ✨